« On Barrons' Analysis of Google $500 | Main | Yahoo Shake-Up Good News; Decker Can Handle It »

November 29, 2006

Time for Google to Try Links

DonkeyGoogle's religion about keeping its homepage "clean" is now getting in the way of its product development.  The site need not look like a NASCAR hood, but the hyperlink is a useful invention, and Google should start using it.

Remember Google Finance?  Half a year ago, Google Finance debuted to rave reviews, startling the snoozing market leader, Yahoo, into action.  Rumor has it that in the past six months the Google Finance team has even launched more impressive innovations.  But have they?  Who knows?  To check out Google Finance, you have to type "Finance" into the search window (or stumble into the Finance section by searching for something else that happens to be contained within it).  And who wants to bother to do that when you can stay on Yahoo and just click a link.  Who can even remember to do that?

Google Real Estate?  Seemed mighty cool when they launched a while back, what with those neat mash-up balloons and property maps.  Does Google Real Estate still exist?  Who knows?

Google Answers?  Another neat idea, one immediately copied by Yahoo (or maybe Yahoo had it first).  Either way, Google Answers is now no more.  Why?  According to Forbes, because Yahoo Answers had 24-times as much traffic.  And no mystery why that is: Yahoo promotes Answers on its front page.

In an attempt to explain why Google axed Answers, Forbes quotes Sergey as saying, “What we are concerned about is that if we continue to develop so many new individual products … you will have to essentially search for our products before you can even use them.” 

Okay, but is the problem really that there are too many products--or that users don't want to bother (or can't remember) to search for them?  Before Google shoots services that users went gaga about and then promptly forgot, could the company at least experiment with another solution--links?  Although the status-quo zealots will scream (they always do), the rest of Google's users will just say, "thank you" and click right through.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/417987/6983360

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Time for Google to Try Links:

Comments

I don't know about what ultimately caused Google Answers to bomb. However, I think you might be right about the link on the homepage thing. I am an avid user of Yahoo Finance - and find it difficult to switch. I did add the Google Toolbar to IE, and I included the button for Google Finance. Since doing that, I do find myself heading to the site more often. If Google would include links for such services right on it's homepage I (and I am sure others) would drop Yahoo! and make Google my homepage. However, there is no need for me to do that since currently, Yahoo! has links right on the front page for me to navigate to immediately. I personally don't want to take the time to "search" for immediate consumable things like finance, real estate, etc... Until they do this, my homepage will stay Yahoo and if I remember to, I will search using the Google Toolbar - but that is new to me, and I am not sure how many folks do their searching with that???

I'm not sure what's what here, but isn't there a way you could build a customized Google page that's going to take you wherever you like? I am strongly of the opinion that Google.com should stay as clean as possible thus making it part of its long term brand strategy. On the other hand, from a usability perspective, yes they need to make it extremely easy for people to aggregate/personalize their Google experience--or suggest some layouts based on the user's activity.

Brin is clever when he says that "you will have to essentially search for our products before you can even use them." Being involved in several web-publishing projects myself, I can highly appreciate the ideas visitors indirectly lead you to by their searches.

They probably did the analysis and found that anything that distracts the user from the search engine causes them to lose money. Remember that those links might carry the user AWAY from those money-making paid search ads.

Just a guess. It could also be that they think it's ugly. Who is in charge there will depend on how the quarter is going.

SI

Sometimes it seems like the people that leave comments @ this blog don't use the internet!? Google has links to all their products...if u setup your Google personalized homepage. U can setup links to yahoo or google finance...

Josh,

You may be right about personalization, but 99% of all internet users are not that net-savvy to personalize stuff, and even if they are, they maybe do not want to. It is a matter of convenience. Don't we all remember the importance of "one-click" options on internet sites? That goes for e-commerce as well as for content sites.

Google homepage must be one of the most desired places of "Internet real estate". To keep this clean is part of their image, no matter how arrogant or wasteful it seems like. Hyperlinking would be a great optimization of this "real estate" but most likely GOOG corporate thinks it can and/or has to keep it this way. They may be rethinking this when/if their shares tank, but for now there is little to worry about for them.

To speak of this "clean" homepage... it reminds me of the headoffice built by J.P. Morgan in the most desirable piece of Manhattan. While it was the most expensive corner, and while it was surrounded by very tall buildings, JP Morgan chose to keep it just a few stories high. It was a touch of arrogance, but for him it basically to show that J.P. Morgan can afford to do it. It was a display of power and attitude.

I think GOOG should keep its homepage clean except to add one link or a tab "Google world" or "Google Portal" - their answer to Yahoo as a webportal.

This is a problem easily solved by software:

1, keep track of the features people use (they already do this);
2, always show them links to the features they regularly use;
3, randomly offer them links to some of the features they've not used recently;
4, always offer them new links as they are generated; and,
5, allow them to remove links they don't want.

It's a simple UI configuration problem and the most of the processing can be done on the client so it's cheap and fast to do. This could be done in a way that is subtle and doesn't clutter the front page, if they could bother.

Having said that, I no longer use Google because the searches suck, meaning that searches almost always seem to lead to retailers and not to information. (Type in "prostate cancer" and get links like "Looking for prostate cancer? Find exactly what you want today. www.ebay.com").

Why is it this blog only talks about Google? Sweet mercy, there are hundreds of other tech companies worth mention. This blog should be called Google Outsider, because you have ignored the rest of the internet.

Uhhmm...the "More" link??

Google Answers and Yahoo Answers are totally different. Yahoo went for high volume, low quality. Google went for lower volume, higher quality *AND*, questioners *pay* answerers.

Don't they make money by having people search "Finance" and then clicking on Google? They would lose the money from the three sponsored links on the right of the search results if they put links to Finance on the home page. Oddly enough when I search "finance", Yahoo Finance is the first result.

Yahoo Finance should be the # 1 hit when searching for finance, but Google actually shouldn't be 2nd...there are serveral other finance sites that are more well known and linked to more frequently. I am not saying Google Finance is bad, I like it, but it shouldn't be the #2 hit when searching for Finance. Looks like Google is messing around with their results.

Bringing up another point that Shinkdew made...isn't funny that somehow Google has convinced companies to pay for advertising under a key word even when the company is the number one hit without it. Try typing in pontiac. So ridiculous. Anything that ridiculous surely has to come to an end...

Haha!

I love the way you say Google should change their homepage to look like Yahoo.

Look at Google's success and look at Yahoo's essential waste of time approach to things (the share price tells its own story).

I think that Google could perhaps do with an odd extra link here and there, but Yahoo is way too 'over-junked'.

Google's approach to things is that 'if you need it you will have it presented to yourself' and it works - a bit like magic really.

Search is at the very core of what Google does, so soon you will probably be seeing Google bring out a whole load of stuff in their search results page - you might even have less links on the very home page, but rather find yourself being able to type in a search term and get back: books, links, images, news, etc. etc. - so your end result will be instant access to any number of customised homepages in a second!

Game over.

Thanks,

Jason Grant
www.flexewebs.com

I don't have any probem saying it: google finance sucks. Might be why no one uses it! Ya think!!!!

"Game over."

It's far from over, bud. Google may dominate search, but clearly they aren't even a player in content. Google Finance is prime example. Google brings nothing to the content table. Google actually sends you to other content providers. Save time, skip a step and go directly to content providers. No one wants to paw through link after link in the hopes of finding what they are looking for.
I appreciate maximum content per page including max links. Go to MarketWatch to view little content value on the home page. Do they really think users will randomly dig through links just to find out what content there may or may be?
The Wall Street Journal puts their entire daily linked content of the journal on their home page. That's is how it should be.

As "pwb" said, Google Finance can be found by going to the "More" link off the homepage. I'm one of those who prefers the tidy emptiness of the Google homepage. I use Yahoo for fantasy football and when I accidentally stumble onto their homepage, it hurts me, all that stuff thrown at my eyes. I don't know if I'm in the minority or the majority though.

Typical one sided opinion masquerading as reasoned analysis. Why should Google have links to Google Finance on its home page ? Whats the evidence it would improve its business ?

Google is a search company at its core and the focus is on a basic, clean and light homepage that gets people to their search results ASAP. Stuff like Google finance ( and others) are peripheral experiments that may or may not come off long term. It's just common sense for Google to focus on what makes them different in search rather than doing the duh-worthily obvious in plastering all sorts of links over their home page.

It's not as if this is a groundbreakingly original piece of insight that no one on google has ever thought of. It just doesn't make sense from them to do. Their core search product is based on efficiency, lack of bias ( thats why google finance appears where it does on their search result rankings) and speed. That's what makes them the most profitable company in the space ( by an order of magnitude). And you are suggesting they start messing with it to showcase some peripheral products that have no current business prospects ? It's crazy.

This discussion is meaningless. Google's methodology is to rigorously test proposed improvements in design / layout and measure their effects on search volume and CTR. I would be willing to bet that they have placed links on the homepage in very limited tests in order to gauge whether these have the potential to increase revenue and found that they do not.

Yahoo focus is stay on the top as a media company. Google's current mission is to organize the world data as a tech company. Google will have to totally change their approach if they would like to move from their search engine to a portal.

>> Why is it this blog only talks about Google?

What the hell else is there to talk about? Yahoo is shedding executives, and if Tim Mayer walks, they may as well just shut down the search function. MSN is pitiful, and has share almost solely due to the IE tie-in. Ask have never been marketed correctly. Whether the "AskCity" thing works or not remains to be seen, but IAC still don't have a clue (note to IAC execs - you could just about rule the WWW. You have the only collection of web based property capable of touching Google. Shame you aren't doing anything with it)

For the moment, Google are just about the only people doing anything WORTH talking about

Detereating fundamentals of Click business are painted in technical Picture which is saying more then thousand words:
http://sufiy.blogspot.com/2006/12/google-weekly-second-top-in-reversal.html

Post a comment

This weblog only allows comments from registered users. To comment, please Sign In.

Sponsored by

Sponsors