Matthew Karnitschnig of the WSJ kicks off the morning with a Twilight Zone piece about how Time Warner may not dump AOL after all, but instead sell off cable and "double down" on the Internet by buying another big net company.
Without commenting on the plausibility of this theory (except to say that it would be quite a change of heart), here are some thoughts:
- Oh, the irony! The theory behind the strategy, apparently, is that cable will become increasingly commoditized and less relevant in a world with the Internet and Internet TV, etc. It was, of course, exactly this sort of thinking that led to the "transformative" AOL-Time Warner merger in the first place. Without concurring that cable will become less relevant (somebody has to plumb the pipes), this would lend credence to the idea that the AOL-Time Warner merger wasn't a colossal, bubble-headed strategic error, but just early.
- The most sensible big-net-company acquisition/merger candidate is MSN. A combined AOL-MSN would dominate online communications, and, together, would have the scale and clout that each company alone currently lacks. The integration, management, and long-term growth strategies, of course, would be a nightmare.
- Assuming Time Warner isn't up for that challenge (and who could blame them), companies like Facebook, Bebo, Music Nation, and others fit into the company's entertainment DNA and would help offset/refresh the demographics of AOL's geriatric user base. They also wouldn't require another bet-the-company roll of the dice.
AOL's having a 'meet the new AOL' event today, so maybe we'll get further details.
UPDATE
A reader suggests another sensible Time Warner acqusition candidate: Joost. Any others? (I personally think Joost would make sense but also be extremely risky, because 1) the site hasn't even launched yet, and 2) if/when Joost is owned by one of the big media companies, it will lose its status as a neutral "Switzerland" BigMedia solution.)
instead of an unrealistic purchase of MSN (I doubt msft will ever let it go), AOL should focus on purchasing JOOST.
The way I look at it... sell off the old way of distribution, and enter the new way.
Posted by: echotoall | April 17, 2007 at 08:17 AM
Good idea!
Posted by: Henry Blodget | April 17, 2007 at 09:25 AM
Henry Blodget
AOL's geriatric User Base ?????????
Eat Rat Poison and DIE !!!!!
Posted by: L | April 17, 2007 at 11:29 AM
I'm still an AOL user, if that's any consolation. I even pay for the subscription.
Posted by: Henry Blodget | April 17, 2007 at 11:35 AM
"if/when Joost is owned by one of the big media companies, it will lose its status as a neutral "Switzerland" BigMedia solution"
true... but then again, so will ClownCo when it goes live. (a BIG 'when') and Big(old)Media is rejecting "Switzerland" w/their procrastination toward partnering w/YouTube/Google. (and ultimately delaying potential profits)
we must 'wait and see'... i guess.
Posted by: echotoall | April 17, 2007 at 03:09 PM
Given Google's acquisition of DoubleClick, I'd think that Yahoo's ad network looks a heck of a lot more attractive than AOL's traffic to Microsoft. Even if Yahoo's ad system isn't as efficient as Google's, it's bigger than anything else out there and there's always the possibility that Panama may eventually work. Plus, does Microsoft really have much choice at this point if they want to play/stay in the ad game?
For what it's worth (as a Valleyite myself), I doubt that promising startups will be eager to become part of the "new" AOL because of AOL/TWX's culture, history, audience, and the East Coast management structure.
My betting card would look like this:
-- Microsoft will buy Yahoo out of desperation.
-- Google will eventually buy Facebook at some outrageous price north of $2 billion
-- Either eBay or Google will buy Monster
-- Yahoo will be busy buying as many small companies as they can get their hands on, if only to get the engineers.
-Ken
Posted by: Kevin | April 17, 2007 at 10:30 PM
Big Media is in trouble.
This can get you six-figures in wealth. Free, Apology-Money, and, Founders stock, paid directly to you, due to the Largest Boycott in History. Congress will actively-support iBoycott. Congress will say, on TV every day, that you-must-get-your money. HERE’S WHY: iBoycott requires that Big Media create three satellite-TV channels, as the nation’s gifts to Congress and the National Committees. To own-and-operate: 1. Congress TV Channel, 2. Republican Party TV Channel, 3. Democratic Party TV Channel. Boycott target is a fast-food, TV advertiser. To please America, it invites the 100 largest TV advertisers to meet publicly on the nation-stunning scandal-crisis.
Big Media’s nation-horrifying mistakes: Silence about (1) genocide of 3,000,000 Black Christians in south Sudan; plus Darfur. (2) Iran’s announced plans for Holocaust II. You can get six-figures in Remorse-Apology money, and, stock. HERE’S HOW: iBoycott requires the largest public stock issuance ever. To reward genocide-Abolitionists like you. You can get free, Founders stock in Federal Beneficial Automatic-IRA SportsBOND Commission when issued. A major boycott is the most powerful social instrument known to history.
Reserve potential $1,000-a-day in National Honor Awards to you, in Money, and, Stock: for one Count-me-in email from a pal. Takes 2-minutes-a-day. $10,000-a-day for you for Count-me-in emails from 10 pals. Reserve $100,000-to-$1,000,000 for you. Friends can do the same. Free. No fees, no payments. Not-one-penny-ever. No tricks. No need to have a blog site. Apologies if this money-power comment is off topic. Get six figures in wealth: see WALL STREET, at The Street’s Big Blog: http://biggorilla.typepad.com
Posted by: TerrenceM | April 18, 2007 at 10:45 AM
Hay!!! best link for you to good night
a lot of useful information, thank you to you let us help each other spam all right I went away to meeting
cheapest cialis
low price viagra
http://anrcollege.edu/images/ds/phenta/viagra_on_line.html ===>viagra on line
[url=http://anrcollege.edu/images/ds/phenta/purchase_cialis.html]purchase cialis[/url] senks!!!
Posted by: NiTininspund | July 05, 2007 at 04:10 PM
sony pcga-bp2s battery
Posted by: batteries | October 10, 2008 at 10:22 PM
thanks admin good post
sohbet-askalemi
-edencity
Posted by: sohbet | July 13, 2009 at 07:46 AM
wonderful post! you have done an excellent work in here!!
Congratulations!!
Danny L. Taylor Viagra Online
Posted by: kathalina88 | September 25, 2009 at 02:50 PM
Hello again!!
n,n
i'm sorry!!!
Viagra Online
Posted by: kathalina88 | September 25, 2009 at 07:33 PM
thanks admin good post
Temizlik şirketleri Temizlik şirketleri Sohbet Sohbet odaları
Posted by: ugurss | October 23, 2009 at 02:45 AM
online poker review
Posted by: james | December 16, 2009 at 11:29 AM
Timewarner definitely needs to unload aol. This is such a bad company. just take your loses and get away from it. It is such a poorly run company.
ponte vedra porcelain veneers
Posted by: jimb12345 | April 16, 2010 at 01:56 PM
Heii .. instead of an unrealistic purchase of MSN (I doubt msft will ever let it go), AOL should focus on purchasing JOOST.The way I look at it... sell off the old way of distribution, and enter the new way. - WELL SAID !! :) Best regards..nice post
how to win the lottery
Posted by: KellyBrown273 | February 03, 2011 at 03:26 AM
Good idea! All the best
how to win at blackjack
Posted by: Cyndiviste.wordpress.com | February 10, 2011 at 07:50 AM
hmm...I'm still an AOL user, if that's any consolation. I even pay for the subscription.All the best
lotto black book
Posted by: Deborahwolfram.wordpress.com | February 14, 2011 at 04:16 AM
The most sensible big-net-company acquisition/merger candidate is MSN. A combined AOL-MSN would dominate online communications, and, together, would have the scale and clout that each company alone currently lacks. The integration, management, and long-term growth strategies, of course, would be a nightmare :)
acid reflux diet
Posted by: Teresereyes8294.wordpress.com | February 15, 2011 at 06:34 AM
Matthew Karnitschnig of the WSJ kicks off the morning with a Twilight Zone piece about how Time Warner may not dump AOL after all, but instead sell off cable and "double down" on the Internet by buying another big net company. Great subject !!!
roulette strategy
Posted by: Domingaperko.wordpress.com | February 15, 2011 at 01:53 PM
Time Warner to Keep AOL, Sell Cable, and buy msn?!!!! Yes... great explain u have shared ..
sports betting system
Posted by: Ivettedonnel.wordpress.com | February 16, 2011 at 01:34 PM
Timewarner definitely needs to unload aol. This is such a bad company. just take your loses and get away from it. It is such a poorly run company...
weight loss diet
Posted by: Sallywede.wordpress.com | February 17, 2011 at 11:24 AM
Thanks for sharing..
Egitim Exsohbet Chat Chat Film izle video izle
Posted by: Network | February 28, 2011 at 07:30 AM
Time Warner to Keep AOL, Sell Cable, and yes to buy msn !! :)
detox diet
Posted by: Johnwhittney.wordpress.com | March 03, 2011 at 07:22 AM
Very interesting post. Thanks for sharing.
Posted by: Deon Lee | May 25, 2011 at 09:54 AM