Map Wars: Google and Microsoft Tussle Over Coolest Map Apps

At the Where 2.0 conference in San Jose--which, like every other web-related conference these days, is jammed.  "Geospatial" content and tool companies have developed into their own micro-economy, and Where is the center of it.

The big fight, here as elsewhere, is between Google and Microsoft, over who can produce the coolest 2D and 3D global mapping platforms.  The startling news is that, in this arena, Microsoft appears to be holding its own.  Google's new "block view" feature is cool (put yourself on map, look at buildings around you, walk down street, etc.), but Microsoft's new "Virtual Earth" project is even cooler.  The latter is powered by high-res photos taken from low-flying planes, and the reported $150 million the company is spending on geospatial content is paying off (at least in the "wow" department). 

As with many of the companies here, Google Earth and "Virtual Earth" appear to be cooler than they are commercial, at least for now.  The most obvious source of revenue on the consumer side of the geospatial business would seem to be local advertising and logo/placement, but if this opportunity is producing meaningful numbers, no one is discussing them.  The CEO of Platial, for example, Di-Ann Eisnor, raved about how much money there was to be made in made in mash-ups, but offered exactly zero details.  The same went for a company that provides "soundscapes" (click on a place, listen to what it sounds like) and Garmin, which has some cool "make your own trail maps with your GPS device" technology that mountain-bikers and joggers are reportedly bananas about. Garmin's model is obvious--sell units--but the gravy train that will eventually have to support the rest of this exploding industry is still unclear.

Comments

[Anders Kargaard Jensen]

Interesting! Keep it coming about Google vs Microsoft!

[ferrisyahoo]

Where's Yahoo Maps in all this? Bueller, Bueller?

[Mike H.]

Curious how Yahoo has not released any updates or new features. Have they dropped out of the race?

Mapquest's position seems to be, from what I read elsewhere, "our users don't want these newfangled maps". I bet they are not winning market share with that strategy.

Ask Maps seems to have some interesting new features but is clearly not playing in the same leagues as the other players when it comes to coverage. For instance I searched for London, and they barely managed to show me the city name on the map (after proudly zooming to London, OH, WTF?) after I manually specified that I want London, UK. No street names or anything.

[etmthree]

This passes for analysis? Boy did I go into the wrong business.

Cooler does not equal more useful.

Just try to navigate down a street in a way that would help you find your way someplace unfamiliar using both apps. Also, which one actually works with a mobile device? Hint -- not the one requiring a 3D graphics card and about a Gig of RAM for caching.

[aizheng]

癌症 肺癌 胃癌 肝癌 食管癌 肿瘤 直肠癌 结肠癌 宫颈癌 乳腺癌 脑瘤 甲状腺肿瘤 胆囊癌 胆管癌 前列腺癌 白血病 鼻咽癌 肾癌 恶性淋巴瘤 皮肤癌 喉癌 舌癌 胰腺癌 膀胱癌 神话 家庭建康 心碎了无痕 pallyboy 幸福 医药类 我的快乐 胃癌的博客 天天健康