« WSJ Bancrofts: Hallucinating Again...or Just Stalling? | Main | No More Earnings Guidance? Hallelujah. »

June 13, 2007



I watched the webcast. Unbelievably, Semel was *not* directly confronted on the most obvious question:

"What objective measures did the board use to arrive at Semel's comp package?"

There's only one measure that shareholders care about... since GOOG went public: GOOG up 6 times... YHOO down -4%.

Yet, Semel is the #1 top compensated CEO in 2006. (AP analysis of 386 public companies and top corporate paychecks.)

Yesterday's annual meeting confirmed it: The inmates ARE running the asylum.

In fact, the way the pay-for-performance proposal was dismissed was almost offensive. "Deemed not in best interest of shareholders."

Having some experience with this stuff, it seems to me that YHOO's board should be deemed *not* in the best interest of shareholders.

Don't know why this gets me so heated but I think it represents the worst abuse of corporate governance and exec comp.

P.S. I never did get an answer to a previously posted question: Did YHOO actually miss last quarter's numbers because of the size of Semel's comp package? From the data I could get, I think YHOO would have beat by a penny instead of miss by a penny. Any way you can confirm that?

P.P.S. What is chance private equity will take out YHOO?


Yahoo faces the same secular problem AOL did. It's trying to be the ultimate walled-garden on the Internet. That's not how people use the Internet. They flit from place-to-place looking for the best information and services. In that world Google wins, because it's the beast helping users do their flitting. Yahoo is dead until it's bought. And the only company that could eat Yahoo without choking is Google. Microsoft would go into convulsions and die if it tried the same surfeit.

dub dub

Wow, that's quite a spin on this disastrous attempt at Yahoo shareholder activism. If this is the best they can muster, they deserve what they got, and what they'll get.


Ebay drops ads from Google. Who loses? This seems like a loss to both companies. Google loses dollars, Ebay loses leads, and also dollars. In the end, I think Google has more leverage since ebay, while being a large customer, is only a fraction of Google's massive income


more on the ebay-google falling out

dub dub

Victor: please learn how to use

Trading Online Free

very intersting! great post, www.TradingOnlineFree.Com


癌症 肺癌 胃癌 肝癌 食管癌 肿瘤 直肠癌 结肠癌 宫颈癌 乳腺癌 脑瘤 甲状腺肿瘤 胆囊癌 胆管癌 前列腺癌 白血病 鼻咽癌 肾癌 恶性淋巴瘤 皮肤癌 喉癌 舌癌 胰腺癌 膀胱癌 神话 家庭建康 心碎了无痕 pallyboy 幸福 医药类 我的快乐 胃癌的博客 天天健康


Semel is out as CEO and Yang is in....

Thoughts... You heard it here first!!!


Since Semel has several times admits himself, he is not a internet expert,probably he should step down as CEO long before..I think his biggest mistake in his tenure was failing to buy Google...
mobile phone deals

Account Deleted

thanks admin good post


Account Deleted

thanks admin good post
Temizlik şirketleri Temizlik şirketleri Sohbet Sohbet odaları

Account Deleted

thank you admin.
Buradan videolarınızı izleyip sexfilmiseyretin.

Account Deleted

Türkiyede ucuz ve kaliteli temizlik şirketinin tek adresi budur işte.

temizlik şirketi temizlik şirketi temizlik firmaları temizlik firmaları temizlik şirketleri temizlik şirketleri işyeri temizliği ofis temizliği ev temizliği temizlik şirketleri

Account Deleted

Bana toptan mal verdiğin için teşekkürler. TRhanks admin

toptan mallar toptan tv ürünleri tv ürünleri ilginç ürünler

The comments to this entry are closed.